A dual-asset model is deliberate. Security assets optimize for skin-in-the-game and governance. Settlement assets optimize for stability and contractual clarity. Merging both into one token creates conflicting incentives.
Incentive hygiene
- Validators and Hosts bond JIT to secure integrity and corridors
- Shippers and travelers settle commercial flows in J1USD
- Governance weight is not purchased through invoice volume
- Contract prices are not pegged to staking reward noise
Markets without collapse
J1USD/JIT markets let participants acquire the asset that matches their role without erasing the semantic split. A Host may earn J1USD and still need JIT on deposit. That is a swap, not a redesign.
Live versus PDF numbers
Keep the dual-asset idea from whitepaper v4. Use live facts for decimals and supply: J1USD 6 decimals; JIT 100,000,000 original mint, 18 decimals. The PDF’s design-time 1B JIT and 18-dec settlement examples are not import settings.